Yes, here we talk about something concerning WikiToLearn, even if it’s hard to trust. Most of the potential of W2L (our abbreviation of WikiToLearn, which I will use in the following cases) is in its communication channels on Telegram: they are great tools through which people meet other developers, editors or interested persons who collaborate; I had some interesting debates with them, noone was banal.
Let me just say that there are too many f*cking Telegram groups. I use Telegram only for this project (my friends and contacts use other communication apps or devices) and I have joined in more than 10 group or channel linked to W2L. And when I say “I have joined” I mean “I was forced to join” in most of them (but my little revenge is that I am a crazy spammer).
Through these group we meet each other, and I am really happy to having met these people and guys, they are funny and nice people; the link with the topic of this post is that @rivasponda – – is a phenomenon born in these groups.
If you use Telegram you probably know the bots, created but some other users, which do different actions in order to the aim of their creation. One of W2L developers, Cristian Baldi, created a Telegram Bot, whose is “Factotum Bot”, and the actions he can do are many and different: you can set it to reply automatically at some carachters strings (one night a desperate Dario spent hours writing “aa” just for read the answer of the bot, who is always “bb”), you can search on the web or YouTube through it and you can also give karmapoints to other people. The link at the bot is this, if you want to use it 🙂 :
But wait, what karmapoints are? They are a great idea of someone I don’t know who was (maybe and probably Cristian himself but I don’t know, when I joined they already were used) which consists in giving a karmapoint (as you can “like” something on Facebook) to some other users who said or did something interesting; the input to give the karma is the simple tag of the user followed by a ++. As you can give karmapoints, you can remove them, just writing @tag followed by – -. And here we are.
It was a cold and not-so-interesting 4th January when I saw Star Wars III and writed on our cafe group (the relax group in which we talk about everything which is stupid enough to attract us) my opinion about. Then, Riva answered me.
What did @rivasponda say? He just said that “Star Wars is something nerd which i will never see, it is bad stuff”. Now, we have some rules in our groups: don’t be racist, don’t be offensive, be stupid everywhen you want because you will never find someone sane or smart but NEVER, NEVER, NEVER say something offensive against Star Wars. From that point it was a quick descend to the negative hell. It became a group’s rule: if you don’t want to have negative karmas just remove karmas to @rivasponda and NEVER give him some positive karmas (really, some crazy people wrote @rivasponda followed by two pluses (I can’t write it, it’s stronger than me) and they lost 7-8 karmapoints in just 4 seconds). As an example, desperate Dario, during his night fight with the bot, removed 10 or more (I don’t remember) karma-points to @rivasponda. Yes, maybe the storm started just because he said something offensive against Star Wars, but the problem is that he never repented about it. So, how deep we are with @rivasponda- -? Let’s ask the bot, through the command \karmachart:
Obviously we did not remove 100132 karmapoints; at a certain point, Cristian set the bot at -100k karma for @rivasponda. They are totally -179 but we would probably get -100k sooner or later.
Yes, W2L is something funny, really. @rivasponda- –